Showing posts with label Lower Manhattan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lower Manhattan. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Archaeology in NY: Free Public Symposium on May 18th

At the Museum of the City Of New York (Gosh they're busy!)

Sunday, May 18, 2008
1:00 to 3:30 PM
FREE w/ ADMISSION

Twenty-eighth Annual Symposium sponsored by the Professional Archaeologists of New York City (PANYC) in association with The Museum of the City of New York.

An afternoon of slides and discussion of archaeology’s contribution to understanding our city.

Colonial Waterfront Development in and around Battery Park: Excavations for the New South
Ferry Subway Terminal.

Program:
“A Battery at the Point of Rocks by White Hall”: Early military fortifications in lower Manhattan
Diane Dallal, Director of Archaeology, AKRF, Inc.

Dendrochronology and the South Ferry Terminal Project: Colonial construction dates, patterns of commerce, and human behavior
William E. Wright, Doherty Associate Research Scientist, Tree Ring Laboratory, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University

Documentation, disassembly and conservation of the Battery Wall: A challenge for a new vision
Joan C. Berkowitz, Director of Conservation, Superstructures Engineers &
Architects

New York City in the Fill: Making sense of all those artifacts
Meta F. Janowitz, Project Lab Director, URS Corporation

Deconstructing South Ferry: Archaeological discoveries enable reconstruction of the past
Linda Stone, RPA, Consulting archaeologist

Friday, March 21, 2008

Icon of Downtown Modernity Considered Up For Landmark Status

From The New York Times

March 19, 2008
A Landmark From the Start, Now Getting Its Official Due
By DAVID W. DUNLAP

The news may be that 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza — the towering silvery monolith that forever changed the Lower Manhattan skyline nearly a half century ago — has not been made a landmark already.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission now intends to make an official landmark out of the aluminum-and-glass-skinned tower, which was completed in 1961 as the bank’s headquarters and is still 70 percent occupied by JPMorgan Chase & Company.

“One Chase Manhattan Plaza is among New York City’s most important mid-20th-century skyscrapers,” the commission said in a statement released on Tuesday, when it voted unanimously to consider the designation, making it all but a foregone conclusion.

And the building’s plaza, where the work of the sculptors Jean Dubuffet and Isamu Noguchi are set in a canyon among the financial district cliff sides, was renamed Tuesday in honor of David Rockefeller, the former chairman of Chase and the man most closely identified with the bank tower.

This is all by way of marking the 50th anniversary of the Downtown-Lower Manhattan Association. Mr. Rockefeller was chairman and the prime moving force of that group, which he has called an early effort “to breathe life into a moribund downtown.”

New Yorkers of a certain age and sharp memory will detect a paradox in celebrating the Downtown-Lower Manhattan Association with a landmark designation, since the group was a forceful opponent of the original landmarks law in 1965. And its first redevelopment proposal, 50 years ago, called for the demolition of hundreds of old buildings in what would later become four officially protected historic districts: South Street Seaport, TriBeCa North, TriBeCa South and TriBeCa West.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

New Landmarks and more to come...


New Landmarks Include Webster Hall
New York Times - United States
The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission today designated five new city landmarks.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/18/new-landmarks-include-webster-hall

A New York Grand Canyon Rides on Landmark Lane
New York Times - United States
LPC considers Chase Manhattan Plaza as a possible landmark.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/18/a-new-york-grand-canyon-rides-on-landmark-lane

Landmarks Tosses 125th Street A Bone
New York Observer - New York,NY,USA
by Lysandra Ohrstrom March 18, 2008

The Landmarks Preservation Commission unanimously voted to hold hearings on a pair of New York Public Library branches in Harlem.
http://www.observer.com/2008/lpc-put-two-libraries-125th-landmark-track-today

Webster Hall gets NYC landmark status for its colorful history
amNewYork - New York,USA
The Landmarks Preservation Commission gave Webster Hall official status on
Tuesday.
http://www.amny.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--websterhall-landm0318mar18,0,5907568.story
New York Daily News, NY - Mar 18, 2008BY JOHN LAUINGER
The effort to expand the Douglaston Historic District could take a major step forward this week.

Friday, November 30, 2007

Gone Baby Gone - 211 Pearl Street to be appended to new construction

From the NYT Cityroom Blog

November 29, 2007, 1:43 pm
A Brick Facade Remains as a Signal for Change
By David W. Dunlap

And then there was one. Or rather, the brick facade of one.
Looking like “Ye Old New-York” set on a Hollywood back lot, 211 Pearl Street is now all that survives of a triptych of 19th-century mercantile buildings that stood until recent years between Maiden Lane and Platt Street.
This month, 213 Pearl Street was reduced to rubble to make way for a hotel being planned by John Lam, a New York developer. The building at No. 215 was torn down last year.

But the facade of No. 211 — a five-story counting house completed in 1832 for William Colgate, the founder of what is now Colgate-Palmolive — was preserved in 2004 as part of the construction of a residential tower at 2 Gold Street by the Rockrose Development Corporation. There are three mysterious shapes in the brickwork.
The counting house will not remain an orphan long in Lower Manhattan. Rockrose is planning a 28-story apartment building at Maiden Lane and Pearl Street that will abut the facade of No. 211. Part of the new building will be constructed directly behind the surviving facade. There will be apartments behind the old fourth- and fifth-floor windows and a double-height space behind the second- and third-floor windows that could be used for offices, a school or a store. (Maybe a Colgate boutique?) The base of the building will continue to serve as an entrance to an underground garage.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

What will be the Future of the South Street Seaport?

From amNY.com
Changes in store for South Street Seaport
By David Freedlander, amNewYork Staff Writer
dfreedlander@am-ny.com

November 13, 2007

The South Street Seaport, an area for decades dismissed as "just for tourists," has re-emerged in the forefront of New Yorkers' minds as architects, preservations and local residents wrestle over the waterfront of the future.

It's been two years since the old salts who hawked their wares at the Fulton Fish Market packed up their ice and grime and decamped for the cleaner climes of the Bronx, clearing the way for the neighborhood's transformation.

What the feel of the new Seaport will be is still unknown.

"It needs to be weaved into New York City instead of being its isolated, insulated, little world," said Simeon Bankoff of the Historic District Council. "It's a neighborhood undergoing an immense amount of change, and there are a lot of interesting ideas about how to fill the void."

Plans are moving forward quickly. Already in the works is the development of several new high rise buildings that would allow for both residential and commercial uses.

"There is a strong consensus that this is a special place and needs to be preserved," said Councilman Alan Gerson (D-Manhattan), who represents the area.

In 1979, the city leased the land to The Rouse Company, which attempted to turn the area in a historic theme park like Williamsburg, Va. Those plans were never quite realized, but Pier 17 instead became a "festival marketplace," with a mall-like building on top.

Today, the Seaport is a hive of tourists, with more than 4 million people visiting per year, more than even the Statue of Liberty.

But it feels cut-off from the rest of the city, a place reserved for visitors only, according to Heather Mangrum, an architect who is leading an "ideas competition" for young architects with the American Institute of Architects to re-imagine the area.

"There are issues for the city here that need to be resolved," she said. "There is a bunch of old infrastructure, but to me, this is not New York when you see a Gap in a historic building."

In February, General Growth, which acquired The Rouse Company in 2005, announced plans to replace the mall with a 360-foot mixed-use tower, alarming residents who see their neighborhood reflected in the ever-encroaching glass towers of the nearby Financial District. Just up the road, Forest City Ratner is building a 75-story tower designed by Frank Gehry that will house Pace University, New York University hospital outpatient services as well as residences.

General Growth has also talked about building an 835-foot tower designed by the architect Santiago Calatrava across the street from the Seaport featuring townhouses that would go for as much as $59 million, though plans for the building are on hold.

Spokespeople from General Growth and from the city's Economic Development Corporation declined to comment on the specifics of the developments.

Already many 19th century buildings have faced the developer's wrecking ball, most notably 213 Pearl St., New York's original world trade center, which is being replaced by a hotel.

Changing uses of the Seaport
1815-1860: The Seaport's heyday as a maritime port
1880-1930: Area slowly declines as ships use west side and New Jersey piers
1966: Community group Friends of South Street Maritime Museum rallies to preserve area from condemnation and abandonment
1979: Rouse Company begins redevelopment of area as "Festival Marketplace"
2007: Plans floated to tear down mall and replace it with high-rise towers.
Source: Encyclopedia of New York City

Copyright © 2007, AM New York

Thursday, November 08, 2007

And down it goes....213 Pearl Street being demolished

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/1830s-warehouse-in-lower-manhattan-is-demolished/
The site provides an opportunity for readers to comment.

November 7, 2007, 4:53 pm
1830s Warehouse in Lower Manhattan Is Demolished
By David W. Dunlap

History is disappearing by the inch today on Pearl Street.
A five-story, 176-year-old warehouse between John and Platt Streets that survived the great fire of 1835 — and every other calamity to befall Lower Manhattan since then — is being pried apart by a demolition crew from A. Russo Wrecking, which received a permit from the Department of Buildings on Monday. The building is not a designated landmark.
It is as spartan as you might expect a hardware warehouse to be. Its red-brick facade and squared-off windows are unornamented. Unlike its next-door neighbor, it cannot even boast of an association with a famous name. (The counting-house at No. 211 was built in 1832 for William Colgate, the founder of what is now Colgate-Palmolive. All that remains is its facade, which was saved as part of the 2 Gold Street residential development. This year, three mysterious shapes were found on a section of the brick facade, as City Room reported in July.)
The plainness of No. 213, remarkably preserved over time, spoke quietly and directly of the early 19th century. Its presence helped conjure an era recorded in 1833 by an English traveler named I. Finch: “In Wall Street the bankers have their offices — in South Street the wholesale merchants transact their business — in Pearl Street the dry-good merchants have their warehouses.”
Given the new jobs and business that will be created in its wake, the loss of 213 Pearl Street will almost certainly help make New York an even wealthier city. But it will leave New York a poorer city, too.

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Pearl Street Updates: What Will Be Left?

From The Committee for the Preservation of Historic Pearl Street
historicpearlstreet@earthlink.net
http://www.historicpearlstreet.org/

Update - 11/05/07
213 Pearl Street
Demolition is expected to begin on Tues. Nov. 6th at 213 Pearl Street, though a detail in the permitting process for the project may postpone the work. It does not appear that owner, The Lam Group will plan to rebuild the facades of 213 and 215 Pearl Street, which was the original vision of Rockrose Development. Lower Manhattan officials are currently in discussions with representatives for the hotel developer.
An AP story on 213 Pearl Street: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071104/ap_on_re_us/world_trade_relic

211 Pearl Street
There is also concern about whether proper precautions will take place to protect the the facade at 211 Pearl Street, which is owned by Rockrose Development. The structure, supported by a steel-framed shadow box, will be left free standing, with demolition and heavy construction work on the immediate block over the coming months. A project manager at the Department of Transportation felt confident that the facade would be secure, especially since wind currents on the block flow north to south, and through the open side of the structure.

Brickwork symbol
There is no progress on dating the brickwork symbol from 211 Pearl Street. Contractors who may have worked on the wall can not be located. A new round of tests by Testwell Labs will try to extract core samples from between the bricks for a more thorough analysis. But in the end, scientific methods may be unreliable, since it could not be confirmed whether the mortar from these reused bricks is from its original or second use.

Monday, November 05, 2007

213 Pearl Street; Still Coming Down?

www.amny.com/news/local/am-wtc1104,0,5612832.story

amNY.com
Historians fight to save city building
The Associated Press

November 5, 2007

NEW YORK (AP) -- Historians are trying to save a Manhattan building that is "a rare surviving relic" of New York's 19th-century world trade center that is to be demolished to make way for a new hotel.

The Greek Revival warehouse is in a lower Manhattan neighborhood that was part of "the process that made New York into America's great city," says historian Paul E. Johnson.

Alan Solomon, an amateur historian helping spearhead the effort to preserve the old red-brick warehouse on Pearl Street, said on Saturday that he believes its demolition to make way for a new Sheraton hotel could start as early as this week.

A demolition application for the site was filed with the city Department of Buildings on Oct. 16 by a wrecking company, but the city hasn't issued a permit yet, said department spokeswoman Robin Brooks.

The old warehouse was recently purchased from a Long Island family by a Manhattan developer, The Lam Group. The developer didn't immediately return a call Saturday.

The warehouse was erected in 1831 -- one of the earliest examples of the Greek Revival style of a cluster of buildings that made up the original world trade center in lower Manhattan, long before the 110-story twin towers that opened in 1970. The Pearl Street wholesalers specialized in dry goods they shipped to storekeepers all over the country.

New York "became like a funnel through which the wealth of the Western world would now have to pass," according to a television documentary by Ric Burns called "The Town and The City." Narrow lanes like Pearl Street "were transformed into the first district in the world devoted exclusively to commerce."

On either side of the warehouse on 213 Pearl Street were two similar 19th-century buildings on a block now mostly owned by Rockrose Development, which has built a luxury high-rise there and is erecting a second tower.

All that remains of the building at 211 Pearl is its facade, and 215 already has been demolished, leaving 213 as "a rare surviving relic of the process that made New York into America's great city," said Johnson.

Most of 211 Pearl St. was demolished to make way for a parking garage. But the facade was saved, along with three triangular shapes in the brick that remain a mystery. Some scholars have guessed they might be symbols linked to William Colgate, the deeply Christian soap entrepreneur for whom the warehouse was built.

Solomon said the demolition and redevelopment of the old trade district is being partly financed by tax-exempt Liberty Bonds, issued by the federal government to rebuild the neighborhood around the modern-day World Trade Center after terrorists destroyed the twin towers on Sept. 11, 2001.

Solomon, who works as a vintage-lumber dealer, is part of a group of New Yorkers appealing to the developer to preserve the facade, along with downtown community leaders.

A Web site called www.historicpearlstreet.org celebrates the street that once formed the 17th century border of New Amsterdam -- New York's original Dutch name -- where oyster shells washed in from the ocean.

Copyright © 2007, The Associated Press

Friday, November 02, 2007

More Demolition on Pearl Street

From Alan Solomon, eastfour@earthlink.net
http://www.historicpearlstreet.org

NEW YORK’S HISTORIC TRADE CENTER TARGETED FOR DEMOLITION

213 Pearl Street in lower Manhattan, an 1831 Greek revival warehouse, is targeted for demolition. According to historians, it is the last structure from New York’s first world trade district.

The five-story brick and granite building had survived alongside two additional warehouses of the era at 211 and 215 Pearl Street on a block (bordered by Pearl St., Maiden Ln. Gold St. and Platt St.) that was entirely owned by Rockrose Development - except for one small lot at no. 213 Pearl. 211 Pearl Street is now a façade. 215 Pearl Street has since been demolished. 213 Pearl Street is a last well -preserved structure. The Karch family of Bayville, NY recently sold the building to the Lam Group, who had purchased the NE corner of the block from Rockrose. The Lam Group is expected to replace 213 Pearl Street with a ‘sexy’ new hotel project.

Council Member Alan J. Gerson and Community Board 1, along with the Committee for the Preservation of Historic Pearl Street, are now reaching out to The Lam Group directly, hoping to preserve what they consider to be a piece of the city and country’s business heritage. The historian Paul E. Johnson called the Pearl Street building “…a rare surviving relic of the process that made New York into America’s great city…the notion that it should be demolished is silly. New York City has more respect for itself than that. ”

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Save the Augustus Hicks Lawrence House (aka the Pussycat Lounge)

Fussy Pussycat to Hungry Hotelier: Hands Off Old New York! Me-OW!

Robert Kremer vows ‘whatever it takes’ to keep hotel man Sam Chang from scrubbing Greenwich Street clean—far-fetched or fearless?
by Chris Shott Published: July 31, 2007
This article was published in the August 6, 2007, edition of The New York Observer.

“This is the only little piece left of what downtown used to look like,” said Robert Kremer, proprietor of the Pussycat Lounge, the 34-year-old topless bar-cum–rock concert club in Manhattan’s financial district.

The longtime flesh-peddler, who’s become a historic-preservation activist, was standing outside his bar at 96 Greenwich Street along a stretch of shabby old buildings, some dating back more than two centuries, many currently occupied by adult-themed retailers, both the overt and the less obvious kind, three blocks south of the World Trade Center ruins—itself, a sort of ground zero in terms of the city’s current hotel boom.

Ravenous real-estate tycoon and lodging monger Sam Chang, the deep-pocketed developer behind some 20 new hotel projects now under way in Manhattan and Brooklyn, has at least three hotels planned for Mr. Kremer’s immediate neighborhood alone.

The forthcoming hotels essentially have Mr. Kremer’s Pussycat Lounge surrounded: a 300-room hotel next-door on Greenwich Street; a 350-room hotel directly behind it on Washington Street; and a 186-room hotel just up Rector Street on Trinity Place. Not that Mr. Chang necessarily needs to surround the lounge—he bought its building in 2005.

The hotelier’s ambitious plot would do more than merely provide 800-plus brand-spankin’-new overnight suites for Wall Street–area business and leisure travelers. It would also cleanse the block of many seedy Old New York charms, such as Thunder Lingerie’s alluring peep-show booths, as well as Mr. Kremer’s precious nightclub, which Mr. Chang intends to demolish to make a driveway—a proposal the bar owner continues to fight on several fronts.

IN ADDITION TO SUING MR. CHANG in Manhattan Supreme Court, Mr. Kremer has made headlines by lobbying to have the Pussycat Lounge designated as an official city landmark—not as the Pussycat Lounge, per se, but rather the “Augustus Hicks Lawrence House,” named in honor of the Wall Street financier for whom the four-story brick row house was originally built back in 1799. In other prior lives, it served as a restaurant and rooming house, as well as a brothel.

“Whatever it is now, it’s still part of history,” Mr. Kremer told The Observer.

Perhaps not surprisingly, six months after his formal presentation to the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission, Mr. Kremer is still awaiting an official response from Chairman Robert Tierney.

And waiting. And waiting. “It’s just sitting on Mr. Tierney’s desk,” charged a frustrated Mr. Kremer. (A spokesperson for the commission said the proposal remains “under review.”)

Friday, June 22, 2007

Stone Street Historic District Draws Business and Visitors

From the Downtown Express

Downtown revelers roll over to Stone
By Jennifer Milne

In the evening, people slowly begin to trickle through the cobblestone street from both ends of Stone St. and from the perpendicular Mill Lane. Those in the 19th century historic district don’t seem to notice the buildings towering over them — they’re too busy enjoying one of the newest hot spots in Lower Manhattan.

Patrons in business dress fill the wooden tables spanning the entire length of the street, creating a sea of pink, blue and white collared shirts. A few hard-hat construction workers mingle with the crowd surrounding the tables, and everyone has his or her own pint of beer or $10 cocktail in hand. The sound of hundreds of jovial conversations echoes off the old brick walls and mixes with the clink of glasses. At the Stone Street Historic District after work, there’s laughing, drinking and appetizers all around.

Stone St., in the southeast corner of Lower Manhattan, is home to a dozen or so restaurants and bars, serving both the lunch rush and the after work crowd.

“It’s like a wild street party,” joked Christina Myers, 21, a hostess for Smörgås Chef at 53 Stone St. “The crowd is big now, but I think it gets even bigger around 7 p.m. And it stays open pretty late — it’s a social scene.”

The immense popularity of Stone St. is something that wasn’t entirely expected when the Landmarks Preservation Commission applied for federal grant money in 1996 — and received $800,000 — to begin revamping the street. The total cost of the project was $1.4 million, including repaving the street with cobblestones and renovating the buildings lining the street.

Stone St. was settled in the 17th century by the Dutch and was the first paved street in America, according to the Downtown Alliance, which worked with Landmarks on the project. The historic district encompasses a two-block area, including Stone, Pearl and South William Sts. and Mill Lane. The low-rise buildings date back to the 19th century and were mostly built following the 1835 Great Fire that ravaged the area.

Stone and its nearby after work hang-out spot, the South Street Seaport, are both frequented by the twenty- and thirty-something crowd. Renz and her friends Schneider and Shari Gottlieb, 21, say they visit the Seaport as well.

“The only difference between here and the Seaport is that the Seaport has the on-the-water feel, more events and more attractions,” Renz said.

Still, even without the water, Stone St. continues to draw in those new to the neighborhood.

Tony S., 21, a Deutsche Bank intern from Villanova, happened upon Stone St. for the first time on Friday night.

“We were just passing by, and I saw the whole street was closed off and we get to drink outside,” he said.

His friend Carlos T., 21, also a Deutsche Bank intern, looked up at the 19th-century brick buildings and took a sip of his beer.

“It’s a really good atmosphere,” he said.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Bogardus Building Landmarked; one of only 5 remaining Bogardus designed Structures in US

From the LPC, http://www.nyc.gov/html/lpc/downloads/pdf/press/05_15_07-3.pdf

The Landmarks Preservation Commission today unanimously designated 63 Nassau Street as a New York City landmark, citing the building’s rare façade attributed to James Bogardus, a 19th centuryAmerican inventor and former watchmaker who pioneered the use of cast iron to imitate masonry and historic buildings. Eminent historic preservationist, author and former New York City Arts Commission member Margot Gayle attended the vote.


"This dignified building is one of only five surviving examples of Bogardus’s work in the United States, four of which are located in New York City," said Commission Chairman Robert B. Tierney. "It’s one of the oldest surviving cast iron-fronted buildings in the City, and our vote today ensures its preservation for future generations. Margot Gayle’s keen eye for Bogardus’s work was instrumental in attributing the building to him."

Initially used for decorative and structural purposes, cast-iron became a popular architectural material for facing commercial buildings in the mid-to-late 19th century, particularly in New York City. Compared with other building materials such as stone, cast iron was paintable, inexpensive, easy to assemble and allowed for the repeated production of decorative features. It was also thought to be fireproof, a belief that changed following the 1879 New York fire that destroyed several rows of buildings fronted with the material on Worth and Thomas streets in
Manhattan.

Located between Maiden Lane and John Street, 63 Nassau Street was originally constructed in 1844, and housed a kitchen tinware manufacturer until 1856. Shortly after that time, a new iron façade was added as part of a renovation of the five-story structure, which was commissioned to capitalize on the transformation of the neighborhood into a jewelry district.

Jeffrey Kroessler & Margot Gayle at HDC's Grassroots Party, May 10, 2007

Ms. Gayle, who celebrated her 99th birthday yesterday, is a founding member of the Friends of Cast Iron Architecture and the Victorian Society in America. She also was a long-time columnist at the New York Daily News and co-authored a book about Bogardus. She connected 63 Nassau Street’s facade to him because it featured four of his trademark wreath-framed medallions of George Washington and Benjamin Franklin on the base of the columns on the building’s third story. Only the pair of Franklin remains on the façade.



James Bogardus worked as a watchmaker, engraver and inventor who acquired 13 patents before moving to Europe in 1836. He returned to New York four years later, and received his first commission for a cast-iron façade in 1848 for a five-story pharmacy. His other surviving buildings, all of which are New York City landmarks, are the Bruce Building (1856-57), 254-260 Canal Street; Hopkins Bros. Building (1857), 75 Murray Street and the Kitchen, Montross & Wilcox Store (1860-61), 85 Leonard Street, The fifth remaining structure is the "Iron Clad" Building (1862) in Cooperstown, N.Y.


The Landmarks Preservation Commission is responsible for protecting and preserving New York City’s architecturally, historically and culturally significant buildings and sites. Since its creation in 1965, LPC has granted landmark status to more than 23,000 buildings, including 1,160 individual landmarks, 108 interior landmarks, nine scenic landmarks and 87 historic districts in all five boroughs. Under the law, the Commission must be comprised of at least three architects, a historian, a realtor, a planner or landscape architect, as well as a representative of each borough. There are 11 commissioners, all of whom are appointed by the Mayor for staggered three-year terms.

Friday, May 04, 2007

Cenntennial Celebration of the U.S. Custom House

Osram Sylvania & the U.S. General Services Administration Cordially invite you to the

ALEXANDER HAMILTON U.S. CUSTOM HOUSE
CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION & LIGHTING CEREMONY

Tuesday, May 8, 2007
6:30p - 8:00p
Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House
1 Bowling Green
Battery Park
Manhattan
RSVP to centennial@gsa.gov

Monday, April 30, 2007

Campaign to Preserve Little Syria

From the Downtown Express

Tour guide looks to save remnants of ‘Little Syria’

By Skye H. McFarlane

Wedged in between the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel and the World Trade Center site, filled with a hodgepodge of rambling old buildings and high-rise parking garages, the area now known as “Greenwich St. south” can often feel like a lost neighborhood.

But when tour guide Joseph Svehlak glances at 103-109 Washington St., he sees a living architectural reminder of a once-vibrant immigrant community — a reminder he’d like to see preserved for future generations.

The Lower West Side, west of Broadway from the Battery up to Chambers St., has been known by many names over the years. During the Progressive Era it was “Bowling Green Village” and “Wall St.’s back yard.” Before the World Trade Center demolished its upper reaches in the late 1960s, it was the “Electronics District” or “Radio Row.”

Svehlak prefers “Little Syria.” In one of the city’s many ethnic ironies, the neighborhood that was devastated most recently by the destruction of the Twin Towers was the first predominantly Arab enclave in New York City. Starting in the 1870s, new arrivals from what was called Greater Syria began to fill the streets, converting the area’s once-fashionable row houses into multi-family tenements.

Ethnically Arab and mostly Maronite Catholics, these immigrants came not only from the modern-day country of Syria, but from Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Palestine and other parts of the region. They were joined by Slavs from Eastern Europe, Orthodox Greeks and Turks, as well as a smattering of Irish families left over from earlier waves of immigration.

As with most immigrant neighborhoods at the turn of the 20th century, Little Syria had problems with overcrowding, unsanitary conditions and poor health. However, the area’s proximity to the staggering wealth of Wall St. made it the target of many philanthropic efforts during the 1910s and 20s.

A 1917 article in the Guaranty News described the work of the Bowling Green Neighborhood Association to provide health care, nutrition, playgrounds and other amenities to the area, thanks to the support of deep-pocketed bankers.

“Today conditions are improving,” the article stated, “but there is still a long way to go and much to do before these immigrants…shall know what wholesome living and thinking can be, and what real opportunity means in this land of ‘the lady with gaslights in her hair,’ as they call the Statue of Liberty.”

By the late 1920s, the neighborhood seemed well on its way, with Arab intellectuals and poets living in amongst working class families. Fathers worked on the docks and mothers cleaned the skyscrapers of the Financial District. There were clean stoops, stickball games and neighborhood dances. Martin and Barbara Rizek, who grew up in the area, described this later heyday in their 2004 book, “The Financial District’s Lost Neighborhood 1900–1970.”

However, the construction of the Battery Tunnel and the W.T.C. flattened much of the area’s housing stock, dispersing residents to the outer boroughs. To Svehlak, the three Washington St. buildings represent a rare glimpse back at the old neighborhood.

Built in 1871, 109 Washington St. was a tenement house. It is still an apartment building today, with a Thai food restaurant on the ground floor. Next door is 105-107 Washington, a broad, Colonial-style building that was constructed in 1925 as the Downtown Community House.

Paid for by soap baron William Childs and run by the Bowling Green Neighborhood Association, the Community House was designed to help immigrants adjust to life in the U.S. It housed a library, a health clinic, a game room, a nursery and even a dressmaking school. The building most recently served as a Buddhist temple and it still boasts rainbow paint and golden Buddha medallions on its façade. Today it is vacant. A sign on the door says it is available to rent from D.H. Realty.

At 103 Washington St. sits the most striking of the three structures, an 1870s tenement-turned-storefront church with a white, neo-gothic terracotta façade. The fanciful exterior, including a relief of St. George slaying a dragon, was installed in 1929 by the St. George’s Syrian Catholic Church. In 1982, the church sold the place to the Moran family, which opened up a second Moran’s Ale House location there in 1986. Since then, Moran’s has become a famous Financial District watering hole.

“What’s amazing is that not only do you have these three buildings still surviving, but side, by side, by side you have three different aspects of life in the immigrant neighborhood — the tenement where they lived, the settlement house where they went for help and to learn to become Americans, and their house of worship,” Svehlak told Community Board 1’s Landmarks Committee on April 12. “We believe that as a trilogy these buildings are cultural landmarks.”

If he had his first choice, Svehlak would like to see all three buildings designated as either individual landmarks or as a mini “Little Syria” historic district. For practical purposes, however, he is pushing for the city Landmarks Preservation Commission to “calendar” (agree to consider) St. George’s Chapel.

The C.B. 1 committee cautioned Svehlak not to focus on the buildings’ cultural significance in his landmarking quest.

“We’ve all been through the process of trying to designate a cultural landmark and I’ve had my heart broken more than once,” said committee co-chairperson Bruce Ehrmann. “When cultural pleas are made to L.P.C., it tends to turn them off.”

For that reason, Ehrmann said, Svehlak should stick to the architectural merit of his Little Syria buildings. Though the committee deemed the tenement at 109 Washington a “non-starter” because of its altered façade and ordinary style, the committee was impressed by both the Chapel and the Community House for architectural reasons. On April 17, the full board voted to support designation hearings for both buildings.

In addition to the board’s resolution, Svehlak has secured letters of support from two architectural historians, Joyce Mendelsohn and Andrew Dolkhart, as well as the Friends of Terra Cotta society.

Since both 109 and 105-107 Washington are owned by development groups, Svehlak hopes that Landmarks will hear his case soon. “I just hope that we can get Landmarks to look at these buildings before some developer knocks them down,” Svehlak said.

Skye@DowntownExpress.com

Friday, April 27, 2007

Only HDC objects to the destruction of a landmark building

From the Downtown Express

Volume 19 Issue 50 April 27 - May 3, 2007

Out of sight, out of landmark protection

— Skye H. McFarlane and Brooke Edwards

In a move reminiscent of radical plastic surgery, the backside bulk of 25 Broad St. will soon be sitting on the shiny new top of 45 Broad St.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission Tuesday voted unanimously to approve an application by Swig Equities to de-landmark and demolish the rear wing of 25 Broad, a 20-story building that was constructed in 1902 and designated as an individual landmark in 2001.

The rear wing juts into the middle of the block between the building’s two main facades on Broad St and Exchange Pl. It takes up around 80,000 square feet, or 16 percent of the building. Under Swig’s plan, all but the lowest two stories of the wing would be removed, leaving room for utilities and a roof-top garden. The square footage, or bulk, of the wing could then be transferred, via air rights, to another nearby building.

The air rights would allow Swig to build 12 extra stories onto his new building at 45 Broad, making 45 Broad into a 47-story tower.

Despite Swig’s nip and tuck of the air rights, most preservationists — including the Landmarks Conservancy, the Municipal Art Society and the Community Board 1 Landmarks Committee — lent at least tepid support to Swig’s application. Only the Historic Districts Council outright objected Tuesday morning, citing their opposition to the destruction of any landmarked structure.

The preservation groups listed several reasons for their non-objections. For one, a new building under construction at 15 William St. will permanently hide 25 Broad St.’s rear wing from public view. Because the wing would be boxed in, demolishing it would open up the center of the block and improve the flow of natural light into the rest of the buildings.

Swig has also pledged to fully restore the rest of 25 Broad’s exterior in exchange for being allowed to demolish the rear wing. Margery Perlmutter, an L.P.C. commissioner, expressed hesitation about how Landmarks would enforce the restoration deal once it approved Swig’s demolition application.

“I’m concerned about giving up our control over the building,” Perlmutter said.

Landmarks chairperson Robert Tierney assured Perlmutter that the building would not receive a certificate of occupancy if Swig did not make the promised repairs. Tierney also joined the preservation groups and the community board in stating emphatically that Tuesday’s decision should not be seen or used as a precedent to allow the decertification of other landmark structures.

Once an office tower, 25 Broad was converted into rental apartments in 1990s. It is now being renovated and turned into condos. C.B. 1’s chairperson, Julie Menin, has an apartment in the building, though she is living in Tribeca with her family during the construction. Menin’s husband, Bruce, used to own the building through his firm, Crescent Heights. Crescent Heights sold the building to Swig in 2005.

Friday, April 13, 2007

211 Pearl Street Mystery Symbol on Television Tonight

Tonight, Friday Ch. 4 News - CNBC's Vivian Lee will cover the symbolic brickwork at 211 Pearl Street. The segment, which is scheduled to follow the show "Medium", will cover the removal work, speculative ideas about the mysterious symbols origins and meaning, and interviews with preservationists and scholars in the U.S. and Europe.

Mortar Tests - Results from analysis of mortar samples are expected this week from the scientific lab at the Met. The tests are a key to the brickwork's installation date, which should determine which theories to dismiss or further research. The mortar tests would only be unreliable if the brickwork was dismantled and reconstructed at some point in the last 175 years, possibly to install utility pipes/wires.

213-215 Pearl Street - 213 Pearl Street remains mostly vacant, with two residential tenants living on the upper floors. A vacant lot on one side and excavation work on the other surround the five story early 19th c. Greek revival building that is attached to the facade of 211 Pearl Street. The facade of 215 Pearl Street will be rebuilt and incorporated into a new hotel on the northeast corner of the block.

http://www.historicpearlstreet.org
historicpearlstreet@mac.com
917.862.7910

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Part of Downtown Landmark Proposed to be demolished

From the Tribeca Trib

Owner Asks to Demolish Part of Landmark

By Carl Glassman
POSTED MARCH 30, 2007

Among its many Downtown holdings, Swig Equities owns a city protected landmark, the massive 25 Broad Street. It’s “a magnificent property,” Kent Swig, the company’s president, says of the 105 year-old former office building. Most of it, that is.

Swig is seeking permission from the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission to “decertify” the landmark status of a rear wing of the building, which would allow him to demolish it.

The owner is converting the 315-apartment rental building into condominiums. The elimination of the 20-story wing (only the first floor would remain) would allow Swig to create views for the new condos in that part of the building, and “transfer” that bulk by adding 12 stories to what otherwise would be a 35-story tower he plans to construct nearby, at 45 Broad Street.

In return, Swig would restore the building’s exterior.

Last month, he made his pitch to the Landmarks Committee of Community Board 1, which is advisory to the Landmarks Commission.

“Can we actually remove this section, place the bulk [on 45 Broad Street] and put in all the dollars that are necessary into a piece of the building that people will see and enjoy?” Swig asked.

Swig said the wing is only 16 percent of the entire building and, in any event, would be nearly hidden by other buildings going up around it. In addition, he argued, much of the exterior has been altered over the years.

“When one looks at the whole building, it’s pretty clear that [the wing] is a secondary feature,” Swig told the board.


Most members of the committee seemed to agree that the building section could come down, but they took exception to other alterations to the building and especially were not happy that the new tower, 45 Broad Street, would grow taller as a result.

“This is a canyon area and it will just become more so,” said committee member Marc Donnenfeld.

Roger Byrom, the committee’s co-chair, had a suggestion. “Are you prepared to consider [offering] something that the community would get a benefit from?”

“We’re very active Downtown,” said Swig, whose company, by his own reckoning, owns “eight or nine” buildings in the Financial District. “So I think we’re willing to look at anything that’s reasonable and makes sense to the community.”

Matters of bulk transfer are not the purview of the Landmarks Committee and in a telephone interview with the Trib, Swig made it clear that a public amenity could not be exchanged for approval of his plans. Byrom, too, said no tradeoff was on the table.

Nevertheless, Swig, who bought the building for a reported $200 million in 2005 from Crescent Heights—its principal, Bruce Menin, is the husband of CB1 chair Julie Menin—said he was prepared to offer a public amenity in another one of his buildings “just because it’s a nice thing.”

Having later met with several board members, Swig said he has an idea “which they are thrilled over.” Neither he nor Byrom would say what that is but Byrom called it “exciting.” Swig returns to the committee April 12 to again discuss proposed alterations to his building.

Menin said she will recuse herself for the board’s vote on Swig’s plan because she lives at 25 Broad Street.

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

2 Federal Row Houses Up for Landmark Consideration

LANDMARKING OF TWO 1820 FEDERAL HOUSES ADVANCES

Two 1820 federal-era houses proposed for landmark designation by GVSHP and the NY Landmarks Conservancy (NYLC) at 486 and 488 Greenwich Street (btw. Spring and Canal) will be heard by the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission on Tuesday, April 10th, at 3 pm. These two houses are among thirteen federal-era houses in Lower Manhattan that GVSHP and the NYLC have proposed for designation; five have been landmarked (127, 129, and 131 MacDougal Street, 4 St. Mark's Place, and 67 Greenwich Street) and three are currently under consideration by the City (94, 94 1/2, and 96 Greenwich Street).

Federal-era houses (1790-1830) are amongst the oldest class of structures remaining in New York City. 486 and 488 Greenwich Street are a particularly charming pair of houses that survive in an area which has seen massive development in recent years. For more information on the GVSHP/NYLC "13 Federals" effort, see www.gvshp.org/federalrowhouses.htm and www.gvshp.org/13federals.pdf.

HOW TO HELP:

SEND A LETTER TO THE LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION (LPC) NOW URGING THEM TO LANDMARK 486 AND 488 GREENWICH STREET, AND TO MOVE AHEAD WITH THE REST OF THE 13 PROPOSED FEDERAL HOUSES -- go to www.gvshp.org/federalrowhousesletter.htm for a sample letter you can use.
TESTIFY AT THE LPC HEARING IN SUPPORT OF DESIGNATION -- come to the LPC at One Centre Street (at Chambers), 9th floor, at 3 pm (bring photo ID to enter). You can also use the sample letter at www.gvshp.org/federalrowhousesletter.htm as sample testimony at the LPC.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

National Parks Service Hosts a Listening Session at Federal Hall

From the New York Sun

Scores of New Yorkers Turn Out To Give Ideas on National Parks
By GARY SHAPIRO

At a special listening session hosted by the National Park Service, about 175 New Yorkers came to the site where George Washington was first inaugurated, Federal Hall, to offer ideas on how America's national parks should best be preserved and enjoyed.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Save the Survivor's Staircase

Take Action today to Save the Survivors' Staircase!

After months of hard work and consultation we have a window of opportunity to move forward with efforts to save the Survivors' Staircase -- the only remaining above-ground element of the World Trade Center AND move forward with the redevelopment plans for Lower Manhattan.

New York Governor Spitzer's administration and the Port Authority of NY & NJ have been working to explore moving the Stairs to a temporary home so that construction can move forward. Please take a moment today to encourage them to continue their efforts.

Two Easy Ways You Can Help:

1. EMAIL GOVERNOR SPITZER TO THANK HIM FOR HIS ADMINISTRATION'S WILLINGNESS TO LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC ON THE ISSUE OF HOW WE CAN SAVE THE STAIRS WHILE STILL MOVING FORWARD WITH REDEVELOPMENT OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER SITE.

2. EMAIL THE DIRECTOR OF THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY TO URGE THEM TO CONTINUE THEIR EFFORTS TO MOVE THE STAIRS TO A TEMPORARY SITE UNITL A PERMANENT HOME CAN BE FOUND

To read more about this exciting development and send your emails, CLICK HERE